RESTRICTED SPECIES LAWS AND REGULATIONS - Current law

2010 Legislation

California Bans Import of Frogs and Turtles for Food 3/5/2010

Fish and Game Commission 2010 Meeting Schedule: Proposed Regulations

AGENDA: 12. CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON THE DEPARTMENT’S DRAFT FINDINGS REGARDING THE DETRIMENTAL EFFECTS OF NON-NATIVE FROGS AND TURTLES  3/3/2010
 

2009 Legislation

F&G: New and proposed regulations homepage

Section 681, Title 14, CCR, Hybrid Animals and Plants: Proposed Adoption Date: November 5, 2009

1. Notice of Proposed Changes in Regulations September 1, 2009

<Snip>Potential examples are: a hybrid bass (i.e. largemouth and spotted bass that naturally occurs in a lake), hybrids of restricted exotic cats and non-restricted domestic cats, and hybrid canines such as coy-dogs (coyote and dog).<snip>

2. Initial Statement of Reason July 1, 2009

<Snip>Examples of potential problem areas include abalone, fin fish, falconry, waterfowl, aquaculture, and restricted species. The proposal would not only help regulate true hybrids but would help in preventing violators from using a “hybrid defense” by causing the Department to be forced to prove a specific animal is indeed a specific species and therefore regulated.<snip>

3. Proposed Regulatory Language

<Snip> when two or more provisions regulating a hybrid conflict with each other, the provision that provides the highest level of protection or that allows the most restrictive level of take, possession, size limit, or bag limit will supersede any other conflicting provisions.
<snip>
When the department determines that the animal or plant is a hybrid of a threatened, endangered, rare, or fully protected species and further determines that the level of protection is not reasonably extended to provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, California Endangered Species Act, or provisions of these regulations and the Fish and Game Code dealing with threatened, endangered, rare, or fully protected species.
<snip>

******************

New and proposed Regulations - CA Fish and Game

671. Importation, Transportation and Possession of Live Restricted Animals PDF File

AB1122 - amended in Assembly on May 14th Amended TEXT

Assembly Bill Text AB 1122 ;  Contacts to OPPOSE AB 1122

PIJAC Alert Flyer

2008 Legislation                 

AB 1634 Documents

AUTHOR : Levine
TOPIC : Dogs and cats: nonspayed or unneutered: civil penalties

SB 1424 TEXT in PDF
An act to repeal and add Section 2118 of the Fish and Game Code, relating to wild animals.

legislative counsel’s digest
SB 1424, as introduced, Machado. Wild animals: permits. Existing law prohibits the importation, transportation, possession, or live release of specified wild animals, except under a revocable, nontransferable permit. Existing law permits the Fish and Game Commission, by regulation, and in cooperation with the Department of Food and Agriculture, to add or delete wild animals from the list of specified wild animals. This bill would modify the list of wild animals by adding and deleting specified wild animals from that list.

VIDEO: The Propaganda Behind The Pet Extinction Bills

California Initiatives regarding animals in MSDOC and PDF files

We the People for Pets: Urgent Call to Action flyers: Version 1   Version 2   Version 3

Declaration of Circulator PDF file

Instructions in MSDOC and PDF files

California Law provides very strict guidelines on obtaining valid initiative petition signatures. Signatures that are improperly collected will be invalid and will not be counted. Please follow directions carefully.

GENERAL RULES

§ All signatures on a petition must be by REGISTERED VOTERS of the SAME County that is designated on both sides of the petition. Use separate petitions for each different county.
§ Print your name and residence address, exactly as you are registered to vote on the top line.
§ Sign your signature underneath your printed name, and print the name of the city in which you live and your zip code. Registration cards are available for free at the USPS & County Elections office.
§ Fill out completely the section entitled: DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR at the bottom of the petition form.
§ That includes printing the circulator's full name, the same name used when the circulator registered to vote, the county of their residence, the address where the circulator is registered to vote and the dates between which the signatures were gathered.
§ When all the signatures are gathered, the circulator should sign the bottom of this section; and then write in the date and location of signing.

MAIL BACK TO: We The People Pets, 160 10th Street, San Francisco, CA 94103-2618
For questions: (650) 296-2169 wethepeople2007@gmail.com


1292. (07-0060)
Property Ownership. Constitutional Amendment.
Summary Date: 11/21/07 Circulation Deadline: 04/21/08 Signatures Required: 694,354
Proponent: Richard Byrd
Amends California Constitution to declare that governmental entities within California, including cities and counties, may not make any law or ordinance that prevents any citizen from owning or legally acquiring property, or that limits the amount of property one may acquire, grow, produce, or own. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local government: The fiscal effect of this measure cannot be determined, as it would depend largely on how the measureʼs terms are interpreted by the courts and implemented by government. (Initiative 07-0060.) (Full Text)

1294. (07-0062)
Recognition of Animals as Property. Constitutional Amendment.
Summary Date: 11/21/07 Circulation Deadline: 04/21/08 Signatures Required: 694,354
Proponent: Jill Holt (951) 541-1669
Amends California Constitution to declare that all animals owned by citizens, including pets and animals used for agricultural purposes, are property. Prohibits enactment or enforcement of any law that would characterize privately-owned animals as anything other than property. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local government: Probably no fiscal effect on state and local governments. (Initiative 07-0062.) (Full Text)

1295. (07-0063)
Prohibition on Required or Coerced Sterilization of Animals or Humans. Constitutional Amendment.
Summary Date: 11/21/07 Circulation Deadline: 04/21/08 Signatures Required: 694,354
Proponent: Dianne-Margaret Hedgcock
Prohibits enactment or enforcement of any law requiring or coercing by any means, including financial penalty, sexual sterilization of any human or animal. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local government: Short-term savings to local governments because of the elimination of spay and neuter enforcement and surgery costs, offset in the long-term by unknown, but potentially significant, increased costs to operate shelters and provide animal control services to an increased dog and cat population. Unknown, but potentially significant loss of local government animal control revenue, because jurisdictions will no longer be able to charge a higher license or adoption fee for unaltered animals than for animals that are spayed or neutered. Potential avoidance of state costs of a few tens of thousands of dollars annually associated with the prohibition of chemical castration of certain prisoners upon their parole. (Initiative 07-0063.) (Full Text)

2007 Legislation

REXANO opposes AB 1634 (please note the AB 1634 is dead for now, we are just leaving this info her so you can learn the background on this bill as it might be reintroduced)
 

REXANO joins other pro animal groups in opposing AB 1634, so called ‘California Healthy Pets Act’. June 11, 2007 FREE posters

California's problems are everyone's problems  April 2007- Editorial

GRAPHS showing California Shelter data

California is proposing an extreme spay/neuter bill AB 1634,  even though facts clearly show there is no factual need to introduce another tax money wasting and property rights infringing animal rights (AR) bill that will only punish responsible animal breeders and pet owners. Furthermore, the table clearly shows the facts; even though the human population increased from 1995, the actual/real number of euthanized animals decreased. This translates to 1.5 decrease of animal euthanasia rate per person. In 1995, the rate was 0.019 animal euthanized per CA state resident, in 2005 the rate was 0.012, 1.5 times less. This clearly shows no need for another anti pet anti breeder spay/neuter law in California.
Large number of animals are feral cats as documented by LA Animal Services Kill Rate Report and this bill will do nothing to fix them.

Table: California State dog and cat euthanasia 1995-2005

Source: Euthanasia data submitted to California assembly by cahealthypets.com, US Census Bureau,
*cats vs.dogs breakdown estimates based on LA animal services statistical data of what percentage of total were dogs and cats in their shelter

Wild and exotic animal legislation:

MEASURE : A.B. No. 450
AUTHOR(S) : Strickland.
TOPIC : Wild animal facilities: inspection.
LAST HIST. ACT. DATE: 02/26/2007
LAST HIST. ACTION : Referred to Com. on W.,P. & W.
COMM. LOCATION : ASM WATER, PARKS AND WILDLIFE
HEARING DATE : 04/18/2007
TITLE : An act to amend Section 2150.4 of the Fish and Game
Code, relating to fish and game.

HTML TEXT

PDF TEXT

MEASURE : S.B. No. 880
AUTHOR(S) : Calderon.
TOPIC : Crime.
HOUSE LOCATION : SEN
LAST HIST. ACT. DATE: 03/29/2007
LAST HIST. ACTION : Hearing postponed by committee. Set for hearing May 8.
COMM. LOCATION : SEN NATURAL RESOURCES AND WATER
HEARING DATE : 05/08/2007
TITLE : An act to amend Section 653o of the Penal Code, relating
to crime.

HTML TEXT

PDF TEXT

<snip>

SECTION 1. Section 653o of the Penal Code is amended to read:
653o. (a) It is unlawful to import into this state for commercial
purposes, to possess with intent to sell, or to sell within the
state, the dead body, or any part or product thereof, of any polar
bear, leopard, ocelot, tiger, cheetah, jaguar, sable antelope, wolf
(Canis lupus), zebra, whale, cobra, python, sea turtle, colobus
monkey, kangaroo, vicuna, sea otter, free-roaming feral horse,
dolphin or porpoise (Delphinidae), Spanish lynx, or elephant.
(b) Commencing January 1, 2010, it shall be unlawful to import
into this state for commercial purposes, to possess with intent to
sell, or to sell within the state, the dead body, or any part or
product thereof, of any crocodile or alligator.

(c) For purposes of this section, "kangaroo" means those species
of kangaroo that are included under either of the following:

(1) The federal Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. Sec.
1531 et seq.).
(2) The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of
Wild Fauna and Flora, signed on March 3, 1973, 27 U.S.T. 1087 and
its appendices.

<SNIP>

MEASURE : A.B. No. 777
AUTHOR(S) : Levine.
TOPIC : Animal cruelty: elephants.
HOUSE LOCATION : ASM
LAST HIST. ACT. DATE: 03/15/2007
LAST HIST. ACTION : Referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and A.,E.,S.,T., & I.M.
COMM. LOCATION : ASM PUBLIC SAFETY
COMM. ACTION DATE : 04/17/2007
COMM. ACTION : Set, first hearing. Hearing cancelled at the request of
author.
HEARING DATE : 04/17/2007
TITLE : An act to amend Section 596.5 of the Penal Code,
relating to animal cruelty.

HTML TEXT

PDF TEXT